Criminal court records search Flaw Let Dylann Roof Buy Gun FBI StatesNumerous major gun retailers, like Walmart, is not going to sell a weapon if they do not have an answer from the F. W. I., because of the fear of public criticism if your gun is used in a crime. The marginal sale of one weapon means little on the bottom line of a big dealer, which is not the case for smaller merchants like the one that sold Mr. Roof their gun. The man offender of killing being unfaithful people in a traditionally black church inside South Carolina last month could buy the gun used in the attack as a result of breakdown in the fed gun background check system, the F. Udemærket. I. said Friday. Despite having in the past admitted to pill possession, the man, Dylann Roof, 21, ended up being allowed to buy the. 45-caliber handgun because of flaws free government background check failing by local prosecutors to respond to a agency request for more information regarding his case, along with a weakness in federal gun laws. “We are all sick this specific happened, ” mentioned James B. Comey, the F. B. I. director. “We wish we could reverse time. From this advantage point, everything would seem obvious. ” 2 days after Mr. Roof top tried to buy the equipment, an examiner in the F. B. My spouse and i. ’s national background checks center in Clarksburg, W. Va., started out investigating his criminal records. The examiner identified that Mr. Rooftop had been arrested this coming year on a felony substance charge, but not charged. The charge by yourself would not have eliminated him from buying the gun under federal law. But evidence that Mr. Rooftop had been convicted of any felony or must have been a drug addict could have resulted in a refusal, so she continued to investigate his track record judiciary.senate.gov. Because Mr. Roof top had been arrested in a small part of Columbia which is in Lexington Local and not in Richland County, where a lot of the city is, often the examiner was baffled by which police team to call. The woman ultimately did not find the proper department and failed to obtain the police record. Had the professional gained access to the police report, she would have experienced that Mr. Roof had admitted to using been in possession of a new controlled substance and she would have granted a denial. The examiner, however , does send a ask for to the Lexington State prosecutor’s office, which will had charged the dog, inquiring about the scenario. The prosecutor’s business office, however , did not respond.